Article 194

By: Christelle B. Amil

Article 194. Support comprises everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance, education, and transportation, in keeping with the financial capacity of the family.

The education of the person entitled to be supported referred to in the preceding paragraph shall include his schooling or training for some profession, trade or vacation, even beyond the age of majority. transportation shall include expenses in going to and from school, or to and from place of work. (290a)

Support

Support includes whatever is necessary to keep a person alive.

  • Natural Support-the basic necessities
  • Civil Support-anything beyond the basic necessities

 

Article 195

TITLE VIII. SUPPORT By: Evelyn Balaoro

Article 195.  Subject to the provisions of the succeeding articles, the following are obliged to support each other to the whole extent set forth in the proceeding article:

  1. The spouses;
  2. Legitimate ascendants and descendants;
  3. Parents and their legitimate children and the illegitimate children of the latter;
  4. Parents and their illegitimate children and their legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter; and
  5. Legitimate brothers and sisters, whether of full or half-blood.

 

Who are obliged to support their children?

Explanation:

Based on Article 7 Both spouses in case of Support that it is mandatory in nature that  both spouses are obliged to  support their children because it is the sacred and important of all obligations imposed by law and it is imposed with overwhelming  reality.

 

 

 

Article 196

By: Jay R. Bautista

Brothers and sisters not legitimately related, whether of the full or half-blood, are likewise bound to support each other to the full extent set forth in Article 194,

except only when the need for support of the brother and sister, being of age, is due to a cause imputable to the claimant’s fault or negligence. (291a)

ILLEGITIMATE BROTHERS AND SISTERS

Brothers and sisters, illegitimately related, whether of the full or half-blood, are also entitled to support each other.

However, if an illegitimate brother or sister is of age and the need for his or her support is due to his or her fault or negligence, support does not become ademandable right and, therefore, may not be given at all.

Article 197

Art. 197. In case of legitimate ascendants; descendants, whether legitimate or illegitimate; and brothers and sisters, whether legitimately or illegitimately related, only the separate property of the person obliged to give support shall be answerable provided that in case the obligor has no separate property, the absolute community or the conjugal partnership, if financially capable, shall advance the support, which shall be deducted from the share of the spouse obliged upon the liquidation of the absolute community or of the conjugal partnership. (n)

Article 198

By Marte Oquias

Art. 198. During the proceedings for legal separation or for annulment of marriage, and for declaration of nullity of marriage, the spouses and their children shall be supported from the properties of the absolute community or the conjugal partnership. After the final judgment granting the petition, the obligation of mutual support between the spouses ceases. However, in case of legal separation, the court may order that the guilty spouse shall give support to the innocent one, specifying the terms of such order. (292a)

Art. 199 & 200 Case digest

Mangonon v. C.A. G.R. No. 125041

FACTS:

On March 17, 1994, Ma. Belen B. Mangonon filed, in behalf of her then minor children Rica and Rina, a Petition for Declaration of Legitimacy and Support, with application for support pendente lite with the RTC Makati. In said petition, it was alleged that on 16 February 1975, petitioner and respondent Federico Delgado were civilly married by then City Court Judge Eleuterio Agudo in Legaspi City, Albay. At that time, petitioner was only 21 years old while respondent Federico was only 19 years old. As the marriage was solemnized without the required consent per Article 85 of the New Civil Code, it was annulled on August 11, 1975 by the Quezon City Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. On March 25, 1976, or within seven months after the annulment of their marriage, petitioner gave birth to twins Rica and Rina. According to petitioner, she, with the assistance of her second husband Danny Mangonon, raised her twin daughters as private respondents had totally abandoned them. At the time of the institution of the petition, Rica and Rina were about to enter college in the United States of America (USA) where petitioner, together with her daughters and second husband, had moved to and finally settled in. Rica was admitted to the University of Massachusetts (Amherst) while Rina was accepted by the Long Island University and Western New England College. Despite their admissions to said universities, Rica and Rina were, however, financially incapable of pursuing collegiate education.

ISSUE:

Whether Francisco is obliged to support Rica and Rina.

HELD:

As to the amount of support pendente lite, the court takes its bearings from the provision of the law mandating the amount of support to be proportionate to the resources or means of the giver and to the necessities of the recipient. Guided by this principle, we hold respondent Francisco liable for half of the amount of school expenses incurred by Rica and Rina as support pendente lite. As established by petitioner, respondent Francisco has the financial resources to pay this amount given his various business endeavors. Considering, however, that the twin sisters may have already been done with their education by the time of the promulgation of this decision, the court deems it proper to award support pendente lite in arrears to be computed from the time they entered college until they had finished their respective studies. The issue of the applicability of Article 15 of the Civil Code on petitioner and her twin daughters raised by respondent Francisco is best left for the resolution of the trial court. After all, in case it would be resolved that Rica and Rina are not entitled to support pendente lite, the court shall then order the return of the amounts already paid with legal interest from the dates of actual payment.

 

Article 199 & 200

Case Digest MA. BELEN B. MANGONON vs. COURT OF APPEALS G.R. No. 125041

Art. 199. Whenever two or more persons are obliged to give support, the liability shall devolve upon the following persons in the order herein provided:

(1) The spouse;

(2) The descendants in the nearest degree;

(3) The ascendants in the nearest degree; and

(4) The brothers and sisters. (294a)

Art. 200. When the obligation to give support falls upon two or more persons, the payment of the same shall be divided between them in proportion to the resources of each.

However, in case of urgent need and by special circumstances, the judge may order only one of them to furnish the support provisionally, without prejudice to his right to claim from the other obligors the share due from them.

When two or more recipients at the same time claim support from one and the same person legally obliged to give it, should the latter not have sufficient means to satisfy all claims, the order established in the preceding article shall be followed, unless the concurrent obligees should be the spouse and a child subject to parental authority, in which case the child shall be preferred. (295a)

The Law sets order of the presence of the persons upon whim the liability of giving support devolves. Ang Family Code po ay nag bibigay ng kaayusan sa mga taong nag karoon ng pananagutan kung sino-sino ang mag-bibiggay ng suporta dito.

Nabanggit pos a taan ang kaayusan nang mga susuporta sa pananagutan ng isang tao.

Articles 201 & 202

Art. 201. The amount of support, in the cases referred to in Articles 195 and 196, shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the necessities of the recipient. (296a)

Art. 202. Support in the cases referred to in the preceding article shall be reduced or increased proportionately, according to the reduction or increase of the necessities of the recipient and the resources or means of the person obliged to furnish the same.

Article 203

Family Code of the Philippines

By Ian Dela Cruz

The obligation to give support shall be demandable from the time the person who has a right to receive the same needs it for maintenance, but it shall not be paid except from the date of judicial or extra-judicial demand.

Support pendente lite may be claimed in accordance with the Rules of Court.

Payment shall be made within the first five days of each corresponding month or when the recipient dies, his heirs shall not be obliged to return what he has received in advance.

The person obliged to render support may fulfill his obligation in 2 ways at his option:

1. Paying the amount fixed or

2. Receiving and maintaining in the family dwelling the person who has a right to receive support

• This 2nd option cannot be availed of when there is a moral or legal obstacle. For example, a husband in supporting his wife, cannot choose the 2nd option if he had been maltreating her.

Dependente Lite means awaiting the litigation (lawsuit). It is applied to court orders (such as temporary child support) which are in effect until the case is tried, or rights which cannot be enforced until the lawsuit is over.

Article 204

by Nitzshell Torres – Dela Torre

Title VIII – SUPPORT

Article 204.

The persons obliged to give support shall have the option to fulfill the obligation either by paying the allowance fixed, or by receiving and maintaining in the family dwelling the person who has the right to receive support.  The latter alternative cannot be availed in case there is moral or legal obstacle thereof.

—OPTION. The right to elect the manner in which this support shall be given is a right conferred by law upon the person whose duty it is to give such support. However, this right is not absolute as to prevent cases belong considered wherein, either because this right would be opposed to the exercise of preferential right or because of the existence of some of the justifiable cause morally opposed to the removal of the party enjoying the maintenance, the right of selection must thereby be restricted.  It has been held that the wife, who is forced to leave the conjugal abode by her husband, without fault on her part, may maintain an action against the husband for separate maintenance when she has no other remedy, notwithstanding the provision of the law giving the person who is obliged to furnish the support the option to satisfy it either by paying a fixed pension or by receiving and maintaining in his home the one having the right to the same.

(Case Digest : Mangonon vs CA GR 125041)

G.R. No. 125041 June 30, 2006

MANGONON V. CA

FACTS:

On 16 February 1975, petitioner and respondent Federico Delgado were civilly married by then City Court Judge Eleuterio Agudo in Legaspi City, Albay. At that time, petitioner was only 21 years old while respondent Federico was only 19 years old. As the marriage was solemnized without the required consent per Article 85 of the New Civil Code, it was annulled on 11 August 1975 by the Quezon City Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court.

25 March 1976, or within seven months after the annulment of their marriage, petitioner gave birth to twins Rica and Rina. According to petitioner, she, with the assistance of her second husband Danny Mangonon, raised her twin daughters as private respondents had totally abandoned them.

Rica and Rina were about to enter college in the United States of America (USA) where petitioner, together with her daughters and second husband, had moved to and finally settled in. Rica was admitted to the University of Massachusetts (Amherst) while Rina was accepted by the Long Island University and Western New England College. Despite their admissions to said universities, Rica and Rina were, however, financially incapable of pursuing collegiate education because of the following:

  1. a) The average annual cost for college education in the US is about US$22,000/year or a total of US$44,000.00, more or less, for both Rica and Rina
  2. b) Rica and Rina need general maintenance support each in the amount of US$3,000.00 per year or a total of US$6,000 per year.
  3. c) Unfortunately, petitioner’s monthly income from her 2 jobs is merely US$1,200 after taxes which she can hardly give general support to Rica and Rina, much less their required college educational support
  4. d) Neither can petitioner’s present husband be compelled to share in the general support and college education of Rica and Rina since he has his own son with petitioner and own daughter (also in college) to attend to.
  5. e) Worse, Rica and Rina’s petitions for Federal Student Aid have been rejected by the U.S. Department of Education.

On 17 March 1994, petitioner Ma. Belen B. Mangonon filed, in behalf of her then minor children Rica and Rina, a Petition for Declaration of Legitimacy and Support, with application for support pendente lite with the RTC Makati

Petitioner averred that demands were made upon Federico and the latter’s father, Francisco, for general support and for the payment of the required college education of Rica and Rina. The twin sisters even exerted efforts to work out a settlement concerning these matter swith respondent Federico and respondent Francisco, the latter being generally known to be financially well-off.

ISSUE: Whether or not, respondent Francisco Delgado be held liable for her granddaughter’s educational support

HELD:

ART. 199. Whenever two or more persons are obliged to give support, the liability shall devolve upon the following persons in the order herein provided:(1) The spouse;(2) The descendants in the nearest degree;(3) The ascendants in the nearest degree; and (4) The brothers and sisters.

There being prima facie evidence showing that petitioner  and respondent Federico are the parents of Rica and Rina, petitioner and respondent Federico are primarily charged to support their children’s college education but being restricted by their financial income-respondent Francisco, as the next immediate relative of Rica and Rina, is tasked to give support to his granddaughters in default of their parents, it having been established that respondent Francisco has the financial means to support his granddaughters’ education.

Art. 204. The person obliged to give support shall have the option to fulfill the obligation either by paying the allowance fixed, or by receiving and maintaining in the family dwelling the person who has a right to receive support.

The latter alternative cannot be availed of in case there is a moral or legal obstacle thereto. The obligor is given the choice as to how he could dispense his obligation to give support. Respondent Francisco and Federico’s claim that they have the option under the law as to how they could perform their obligation to support Rica and Rina, respondent Francisco insists that Rica and Rina should move here to the Philippines to study in any of the local universities. Thus, he may give the determined amount of support to the claimant or he may allow the latter to stay in the family dwelling. This option cannot be availed of in this case since there are circumstances, legal or moral, between respondent and petitioner which should be considered. Respondent Francisco is held liable for half of the amount of school expenses incurred by Rica and Rina as support pendent lite. As established by petitioner, respondent Francisco has the financial resources to pay this amount given his various business endeavors, thus the amount of support should be proportionate to the resources or means of the giver and to the necessities of the recipient. The Decision of the Court of Appeals fixing the amount of support pendente lite to P5,000.00 for Rebecca Angela and Regina

Isabel, are hereby MODIFIED in that respondent Francisco Delgado is hereby held liable for support pendente lite in the amount to be determined by the trial court pursuant to this Decision.**Considering, however, that the twin sisters may have already been done with their education by the time of the promulgation of this decision, we deem it proper to award support pendente lite in arrears to be computed from the time they entered college untilthey had finished their respective studies.

NOTES:**mayaman si lolo kasiiii (respondent Francisco is the majority stockholder and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Citadel Commercial, Incorporated, which owns and manages twelve gasoline stations, substantial real estate, and is engaged in shipping, brokerage and freight forwarding. He is also the majority stockholder and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Citadel Shipping which does business with Hyundai of Korea. Apart from these, healso owns the Citadel Corporation which, in turn, owns  real properties in different parts of the country. He is likewise the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Isla Communication Co. and he owns shares of stocks of Citadel Holdings. In addition, he owns real properties here and abroad.

What is SUPPORT ‘PENDENTE LITE’

 SECTION 1. Application.- At the commencement of the proper action or proceeding, or at any time prior to the judgment or final order, a verified application for support pendente lite may be filed by any party stating the grounds for the claim and the financial conditions of both parties, and accompanied by affidavits, depositions or other authentic documents in support thereof.